In The Skeptical Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg challenges widely held beliefs that the global environment is progressively getting worse. Using statistical. So the world isn’t doomed after all? Chris Lavers is himself sceptical about Bjørn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the. Bjorn Lomborg is a Danish author and political scientist, and President of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre. He’s best known for his
|Country:||Saint Kitts and Nevis|
|Published (Last):||27 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||5.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He decided to review the state of the world from many, many angles, including humanity, all types of resources, animals and plants, as well as their interactions.
You’ve never had it so good
This is an exhaustively researched and detailed book that covers many environmental topics and is not limited to global warming. Lomborg decides to write a book testing many of the libertarian’s claims, such as the trickle-down theory of economic development. He says that there’s a myth of limited growth among environmentalists, which seems very intuitive but is false: They classify the types of criticisms leveled at Lomborg and his arguments, and proceed to evaluate each of the reasons given for disqualifying Lomborg.
Reading Lomborg one sometimes feels like the light has been turned on or the mists have cleared on many topics. A lot of environmentalists including me, at one time are more ideological than knowledgable. Unless we innovate our way into brains-in-jars, we need those resources to survive. Peter Gleick ‘s assessment, for example, states: The hole in the ozone layer is more or less fixed; the global-warming threat has been much exaggerated.
One assumes Lomborg set himself up for the ridicule he has received; you don’t tackle topics such as deforestation, global warming, Rachel Carson and the legacy of drooling idiots she has left in her wake, and other such imbecilities without the imbeciles who foster the myths wanting to castrate you. Just because we have room lots for improvement doesn’t mean things are not going in the right direction.
Like many people, I had been so browbeaten into a state of despair by the perpetual doom and gloom messages of the environmental movement that I had essentially numbed myself to what seemed like such a hopeless problem. If, on the other hand, you are an intelligent reader, concerned with the state of the environment, this book will make you see red.
No trivia or quizzes yet.
The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjørn Lomborg
They’ll benefit and their decendents will benefit, the very decendents we’re so worried about suffering from the effects of global warming. Lomborg designated the report “one of the best-researched and academically most ambitious environmental policy publications,” but criticized it for using short-term envjronmentalist to predict disastrous consequences, in cases where long-term trends would not support the same conclusions.
Their problems go so much deeper. He also spends a lot of energy discounting both oil and water shortages. We do know a heck of a lot about cows and we understand the impacts of the planned death of a cow, but we just don’t know much about those bottom-dwelling critters many of which probably play an important role in cleaning the water or feeding the fish we eat.
He argues that such concerns are vastly exaggerated in the public perception, as alcohol and coffee are the foods that create by far the greatest risk of cancer, as opposed to vegetables that have been sprayed with pesticides.
It does however provide a lot to think about. There is little evidence that the world is in trouble, he claims, and a good deal more that suggests that we’ve skeptocal had it akeptical good. This might be so, but if we only spend resources fighting problems of today, while ignoring potential problems of the future, we will always be on the passive and reacting to problems.
However, he takes his statistical methods too far. He advises us oomborg to invest at all today and hold on to our money until after some event has happened for sure. Whetehr it would have met with less skepticism coming form Jan Harold Brunvand is anyone’s guess.
In this world, it’s environmentalst arithmetic. All in all a very good book on a diverse range of environmental issues which again is in family with other lighter reads but provides a much deeper understanding. I’ve heard elsewhere that nuclear energy will save us. His text, they said, misrepresented the actual positions of environmentalists and scientists, and his analysis was marred by invalidating errors that include a narrow, biased reading of the literature, an inadequate understanding of the science, and quotations taken out of context.
To ask other readers questions about The Skeptical Environmentalistplease sign up.