Spire Law Group Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury. Piggybankblog posted on 10/25/12 Cross linked with. Case cvJBW-RML Document 36 Filed 10/25/12 Page 24 of PageID #: regulators including the Obama Administration not. Case number, cvJBW-RML They said in the NY press she slashed her throat, but that’s not what the wound description was.

Author: Fautaur Felkis
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 2 January 2013
Pages: 241
PDF File Size: 3.36 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.15 Mb
ISBN: 681-4-21288-370-5
Downloads: 83718
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gamuro

Related publications Share Embed Add to favorites Comments. By these tactics, systems, and delays, Defendants intend to and are in fact buying time as they a accept the benefits of the Ponzi scheme and conversion activities described herein, b cover up their historical conversion and Ponzi scheme, and c make it materially more expensive and difficult for the Plaintiffs to locate no.12-cv04269-jbw-rml stolen assets and gain recompense.

When suppressing and concealing from these Plaintiffs the facts and circumstances herein described, the Defendants intended to induce each Plaintiff to alter his position to his harm. Site Disclaimer and About John Wright.

Case 1:12-cv-04269-JBW-RML

The activities of the Bankster enterprise directly affected U. In addition, Defendant BofA has admitted the involvement of co-conspirators a located in countries without treaties with the United States of America and b pursuant to instruments and prospectuses that purport to dissuade but not expressly prohibit the involvement of such foreign countries. Thus, the original lender was paid when it sold the promissory note executed by the borrower, and the MBS pool was also paid in full by virtue of the CDS payments received.

Grab our RSS Feed. This Defendant is fully subject to jurisdiction in Case 1: Through their conduct as described herein, all Defendants herein were unjustly enriched at the expense of each Plaintiff and by taking his or her money under false pretenses and by ultimately foreclosing or attempting to foreclose upon the homes of the Plaintiffs without legal authority to do so.

The New York Genesis of the Bankster Enterprise In addition to the detailed jurisdictional and venue oriented facts set forth above, the racketeering and money laundering scheme outlined in detail throughout this complaint had as its only epicenter: Venue is proper in this judicial district under 18 U. You can join the fight against the Dark Cabal and accelerate its demise just by boycotting Big Pharma.

Further, and as a result of the nefarious scheme of the Defendants, the Plaintiffs could not refinance or sell their residences without suffering a loss of their equity investments.

All of said intentional misrepresentations and omissions were no.12-cv-04269-jba-rml by the Defendants with the intent to induce the consuming public, including the Plaintiffs, to enter into mortgage loan transactions that would deprive them of the equity in their homes.


Tag Archives: Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML

Further, those Defendants that did not actively cade the acts or omissions described in this Complaint did affirmatively aid and abet the other Defendants in the performance of such acts of omissions, before, during or after the fact. I’m not going to go into what evidence was destroyed during that collapse at this time. They do NOT act in the best interest of all of us, period. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: However, its predatory lending practices caused it to fail.

Case No. cvJBW-RML —

Canada is a land of official silence and coverup when it comes to its own ongoing genocide. Accordingly, each Defendant, named or unnamed, should be held liable for the acts and omissions complained of. Statutory relief under the specific statutes cited above as set forth in the applicable causes of action against defendants named therein; 5. The true names and capacities of the Defendants listed herein as DOES 2 through 1, are unknown to Plaintiffs who therefore sue these Defendants by such fictitious names.

It has to do with the election of Obama.

The Defendants — particularly the loan pools operating under the direction of the Geitner Group — orchestrated the siphoning of the stolen money in direct consultation and association with terrorists, drug cartels, unsourced money entities, and United No.12-cv-04269-jbw-fml Treasury.

Defendants herein include some of our leading financial institutions — institutions upon which the Plaintiffs thought they could rely, and did in fact rely upon. Thus, these Defendants are legally incapable to be able to enter into loan modifications with any Plaintiff. Thus, these Defendants are legally incapable to be able to enter into loan modifications with any Plaintiff.

However, the Defendants have hidden and suppressed the fact that they do not own the subject promissory notes and hence have no legal or contractual authority to offer such loan modifications. The Dodd-Frank Legislation purports to prohibit the protection of companies deemed too big to fail.

June 19, However, its predatory lending practices caused it to fail. Attorney fees as authorized and provided for by statute, contract or otherwise; and For the appointment of a receiver and injunctive relief as this Court deems appropriate under the no.1-cv-04269-jbw-rml causes of action against defendants named therein; 9. Even these expansive Case 1: Plaintiffs became caught up in the tangled Ponzi-scheme-web of Defendants innocently under the guise of applying for a routine home loan or refinancing of an existing home mortgage loan, and have been trying to recover back their money in the sums alleged herein without success ever since.


The Havens for the money laundering schemes — and certain of the names and places of these entities — are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to no.12-cv-04269-jbw-tml interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.

This has resulted in numerous cases where the Holder-Dunn Group and their affiliates — or those acting on their behalf — have admitted to extrinsic fraud, suborning perjury, attempting to fix cases, fabricating evidence and directing the use of prosecutorial cas resources in an unequal, vindictive and selective way in which innocent people and home owners nationwide have been targeted.

The allegations in the foregoing paragraphs are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters.

On information and belief, puppeteer Geitner received some of this money.

Case cvJBW-RML | What If missouri

The Plaintiffs are entitled to the damages as alleged and described in the First Cause of Action — and as alleged above — as a direct and proximate result of this conspiracy of all Defendants to commit repeated and serial acts of cae against these Plaintiffs as described herein.

After Defendants profited by their deceit and concealment, they then continued demanding and collecting monies from Plaintiffs, constituting outright conversion. The Csse should have disclosed these suppressed facts to the Plaintiffs because they were material to the cost-benefit analysis that should have and could have been undertaken by each Plaintiff. Far from being isolated as one example of unlawful conduct toward those on the enemies list, the Holder-Dunn Group has no.12-cv-04269-jbw-fml over the highest level jo.12-cv-04269-jbw-rml warrantless searches, seizures, wiretaps and creations of sham files and sham court filings and sham recordations and sham socalled phantom litigations, in the history of all United States administrations before them.

In the words of Bill Cooper before he was murdered: Here, in order to avoid the unjust enrichment of the Defendants, each Defendant should be ordered to pay back to each Plaintiff any and all monies unjustly received from him or her. The financial condition of the various Defendants was not sound, but rather was a house of cards ready to collapse.