During its long history the problem of reducing language to writing, and Florian Coulmas presents detailed descriptions of the world’s writing systems and. This book is an account of the writing systems of the world from earliest times to the Writing, Coulmas contends, is not only the guide or garment of spoken. o Florian Coulmas This book is in . Sign system to writing system: changing semiotic P. T. Daniels and W. Bright, The World’s Writing Systems.
|Published (Last):||9 April 2016|
|PDF File Size:||1.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.21 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The chapter concludes with a “Note on terminology and notation. Diphthongs are wrongly claimed to be written by combining Waaw, Yaa’, and ‘Alif Spelling with a Capital ‘S’.
The invention of writing occurred in Mesopotamia, China, and Mesoamerica because the “remarkable reinterpretation” was done by people speaking monosyllabically organized languages — languages in which most morphemes most words, even comprise a single syllable. The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems.
A basic knowledge wrjting linguistics and coulmxs technical vocabulary is assumed and there are a few questions for discussion at the end of each chapter, but Writing Systems is not just a text for university students. Its History and Structure, ed.
Universal Declaration writinb Human Rights, Article 1.
Account Options Sign in. C systemms the transparency of modern Korean orthography, as comparing any transcription of the language with a transliteration will show Sohn Universal Declaration of Human Rights article 1. Psycholinguistics of Writing Chapter In what dialect of English is there a word [ju: In discussing the absence of V-letters he adduces the non-existence of vowel-initial words in West Semitic languages, but fails to take into account the probable inspiration for the West Semitic signary from the consonant-only Egyptian writing system; but when he goes on to inquire, “What if V-initial words Next Coulmas considers “signs of syllables”, presenting theoretical notions of a syllable and analysis into onset, rhyme, and tone.
A History of Writing in Japan. Signs of Words Seven chapters follow that treat the various ways units of writing are paired columas units of language. It is not, as C says, the “basic grid of cuneiform ‘Syllabary A’. In Akkadian, a CV sign can be followed by an echo V sign.
Writing Systems of the World – Florian Coulmas – Google Books
Writing Systems of the World. It is a clear and lucid account of a fascinating topic. In another way, though, to insist on the sequence — the linearity — of writing is to disregard much recent work emphasizing the non-linear nature of writing as opposed to speaking: Script transfer is indeed a topic that comes up again and again in the book recall the quotation under “Principle of historicity” but C again misses the opportunity to embrace or engage existing proposals that when script transfer involves scholars who already have a tradition of grammatical study of their language, the outcome is an improvement, subtle or major; but when script transfers involve careful learning of a script and application of its principles unchanged to a new language, the outcome is often a script that fits the new language less efficiently than in the model Daniels ; if it be suggested that the article is published rather obscurely, C has an article in the same journal number; cf.
With these preliminaries out of the way, Coulmas begins with “signs of words”. A Key to the History of Mankind. Thus I can only applaud C’s admission of both the consonantary my “abjad” and the “semi-syllabary” my “abugida” to the basics of script typology; but I’m disappointed that he does not recognize the usefulness of a term for the latter that does not include morphemes relating either to “alphabet” or “syllabary,” so as to emphasize its independence of the other two types.
Traditionally, three such units have been recognized by writers on writing: Sociolinguistics of writing; Appendix: The conventional pairing of Cherokee and Cree as on C’s pp. They map onto other levels of linguistic structure “phonetic, phonemic, morphophonemic and lexical” in complex ways, requiring interpretation at different levels.
The vowel-indication systems that were introduced during the first millennium CE for Syriac, Hebrew, and Arabic are of course optional, but they are not the only device for notating vowels.
Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics: Writing Systems: An Introduction to Their Linguistic Analysis
But what of the Diringer connection? Roman In discussing what to call the writing system in which, for instance, this review is composed, C mentions that wwriting term ccoulmas alphabet” is ambiguous between “the writing system of the Latin language” and “a set of 26 letters serving the writing systems of a great number of languages, The status of Indian scripts is debated, with labels like “neosyllabary”, “semisyllabary”, “syllabic alphabet”, and “alphasyllabary” used to avoid a choice between “alphabet” and “syllabary”.
The Best Books of This is a favorite topos of Roy Harris, who, however, is quoted only sparingly and only on other issues. The bio-mechanics of the production and reception of speech and writing are different.
But tactically, to begin chapters with discussions of the notions of “word,” “syllable,” and “segment” seems misguided — as is well known, these are three of the most difficult concepts in linguistics, and it seems an unnecessary complication to ask the student of writing systems — who will have an intuitive understanding of them — to become involved in age-old discussions.
Clearly organised and engagingly written, it is the ideal textbook for use on courses on writing systems.