Editorial Reviews. From Publishers Weekly. Bacevich’s dense text may not be ideal for an “Andrew Bacevich speaks truth to power, no matter who’s in power, which may be why those of both the left and right listen to him.”—Bill Moyers. “Andrew Bacevich speaks truth to power, no matter who’s in power, which may be why those of both the left and right listen to him.”—Bill Moyers An immediate. Andrew J. Bacevich, The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism ( New York: Metropolitan Books, ), pp., $ Andrew Bacevich’s latest .
|Published (Last):||23 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||9.54 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In an earlier age, Americans saw empire as the antithesis of freedom. Politicians may argue that the military should make more use of reserves and draftees, but candid professional military people affirm that in their experience citizen-soldiers are more trouble than they are worth.
In an immediate og, it is the soldier who bears the burden of such folly. As actually expressed and experienced, what is freedom today? August 15, Andrew J.
Congress has been moved outside the circle of real power over decisions about military initiatives.
Truman and that during this time power has become increasingly concentrated in the executive branch. Its dominance was unquestioned and unambiguous.
Robert Heineman ansrew, Alfred University Amazon: Here is the central paradox of our time: Reliance on government power to impose U.
The Limits of Power
The connection between these two tendencies is a causal one. The enemy of realism is hubris, which in Niebuhr’s day, and in our own, finds expression in an outsized confidence in the efficacy of American power as an instrument to powwer the global order.
In some respects, this must be cause for celebration. Realism in this sense implies an obligation to see the world as it actually is, not as we might like it to be. Yet if pressed, Washington poer not hesitate to use force, as its numerous military adventures during the s demonstrated.
Indispensable reading for every citizen. Except in the eyes of the deluded and the disingenuous, it has long since become a fool’s errand.
Soldiers cannot accomplish these tasks, nor should we expect politicians to do so. Expectations that the world beyond our borders should accommodate the American way of life are hardly new.
With Americans, even in war time, refusing to curb their appetites, the Long War aggravates the economic contradictions that continue to produce debt and dependency. Everyone should read it. His book should be read by every concerned US citizen. In effect, Americans now confront a looming military crisis to go limirs with the economic and political crises that they have labored so earnestly to ignore.
That war was always unnecessary. Bacevich who identifies three major problems facing our democracy: Certain of our own benign intentions, we reflexively assign responsibility for war to others, typically malignant Hitler like figures inexplicably bent on denying us the peace that is our fondest wish. Writing de cades ago, Reinhold Niebuhr anticipated that predicament with uncanny accuracy and astonishing prescience.
The Limits of Power by Andrew Bacevich | American Empire Project
In point of fact, however, globalization served as a euphemism for soft, or informal, empire. The decision makers who wield executive power seem oblivious to the impending dangers that their policies have engendered.
It only became more itself. The resulting sense of entitlement has great implications for foreign policy. These similarities express four core convictions: They reflect the accumulated detritus of freedom, the by- products of our frantic pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.
How did we get to this point? By the time the East- West standoff that some historians had termed the “Long Peace” ended inthe United States had already embarked upon a decade of unprecedented interventionism. In others, it might be cause for regret. After all, these small events left unaltered what many took to be the defining reality of the contemporary era: Bacevich believes that constructive strategy in foreign policy must recognize that the U.
The actual exercise of American freedom is no longer conducive to generating the power required to establish and maintain an imperial order. Meanwhile, from the Carter administration through the Reagan presidency the military was continually building both politically and ideologically for a major effort in the Persian Gulf region.
As individuals, Americans never cease to expect more. While the defense of American freedom seems to demand that U.