Contact Lenses Grading Scales. Etiology. Normal grade. Comment. Bulbar redness. Dilation of bulbar vessels, e.g. due to mechanical stimulation. CCLRU O GRADING SCALES. CCLRU. SCCLRU. BULBAR REDNESS. SLIGHT. 2. SLIGHT. 3. MODERATE. SEVERE. OCCLRU. LIMBAL. Eye care professionals: See the Efron Grading Scales for a standard clinical reference for describing the severity of 16 contact lens complications.

Author: Najinn Nami
Country: Turks & Caicos Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 12 June 2016
Pages: 157
PDF File Size: 16.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.99 Mb
ISBN: 720-2-62750-552-4
Downloads: 41843
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zunos

Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis

Included in the improved version will be high definition images and compatibility with iPads as well as iPhones. In conclusion, the printed grading scales analysed were quadratic in nature, having a higher sensitivity for grading features of low severity.

This may involve the use of movie sequence of images, a CD for the Efron gratings, a phone app, or computer software programs. Increments of scales used.

Edge detection graing are local rather than global in nature and examine the surrounding pixels to determine the presence of edges vessels or areas of staining.

Accepted Mar Image analysis of conjunctival hyperaemia: Grading conjunctival hyperaemia using a photography-based method.

EFRON-CCLRU GRADING SCALES for (Android) Free Download on MoboMarket

Ideally, prior to contact lens wear, the baseline data for a range of clinical variables should be collected and then be continually monitored throughout the course of the patients wearing experience.

Indeed it is estimated that overcopies of these scales — usually in the form of laminated A4 reference cards but also in large poster format — have yrading provided to practitioners in the past 20 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; gradjng Highlighting the papillae with fluorescein would appear a more appropriate method for determining palpebral roughness as previously described, 25, 26 causing an increase in edges detected and a decrease in the fluorescein coverage, despite an apparent decrease in severity with the highest CCLRU scale grade.


A second study was by Efron et al. The view expressed by a small minority of optometrists was that grading scales constitute an unreliable or inaccurate method of recording clinical data is contrary to published evidence. Tarsal conjunctival morphometry of Asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers and non-wearers. Staining can differ in intensity dependent on factors such as the amount of fluorescein instilled, tear film production and drainage, depth of the woundarea, shape, and segmentation.

Quantitative slit lamp observations in contact lens practice. Ophthal Physiol Opt ; Examples of more recently introduced grading scales. However, image analysis would have merit in monitoring changes in individual patients with time and the computer could also count the number of segments identified to identify between punctate and confluent type stainingprovide a ratio of the longest to the shortest axis to give an indication of shape in addition to the measures of edges detected a stable indicator of area and green colouration stain intensity.

Optom Vis Sci ; What we are not that good at, however, is being consistent with our colleagues.

Approaches to this challenge are still emerging and further developments in this area are anticipated. Southwest Independent Institutional Review Board, The average time taken to record anterior eye health was 6. Editor’s choice Look local: J Allergy Clin Immunology ; They allow for an accurate means of detecting change that can occur during lens use and provide the practitioner grsding the necessary information to intervene to minimise the risk of a chronic adverse reaction to the contact lens.


Guillon MShah D.

Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis

These alternative approaches to record keeping can all be considered as representing good clinical practice. Finer scales have the advantage of being capable of recording clinical change more sensitively.

Both techniques were strongly correlated with increasing bulbar gradjng scale grades, although for higher grades the Annunziato and Vistakon-Synoptik scales rely on an increase in red colouration in isolation, rather than in combination with an increased number of blood vessels. The app enables levels of severity to be compared side-by-side in 0.

Grading features such as palpebral hyperaemia, palpebral roughness, and corneal staining is complex and there is a compromise between the simplicity of a single scale and the ability to fully describe and monitor changes in the feature.

Lies, statistics, and clinical significance.

They require a given ocular feature to be gauged relative to predetermined images chosen to represent different degrees of the condition of interest on an ordinal scale.