The paper describes ethical issues involved in the work of a TV journalist. The author – an experienced editor and producer of TV programs – diagnoses the. etyka dziennikarska zadania mediów: role jakie powinny pełnić media epołeczeńetwie reguluje prawo prasowe. wolność to eytuacja kiedy władza. Title, Etyka dziennikarska. Author, Jan Pleszczyński. Publisher, Difin, ISBN, , Length, pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX.

Author: Nilkis Zulkigrel
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 21 January 2011
Pages: 200
PDF File Size: 3.18 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.75 Mb
ISBN: 841-8-35451-772-4
Downloads: 16761
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dozshura

On the one hand, journalism stretches in various forms across all of the ways in which we come together as a collective. What would be left in the end, and how much of it would we recognize?

What would literature look like? Are there easy answers to financial meltdown, global warming, disease? This notion goes far beyond the work of Kuhn, and it is implicated in scholarship by Durkheim, Foucault, and others — all of whom maintained in different ways that the social group is critical to dziennikafska ways of knowing the world.

What about tweets on twitter? One is that the bulk of our scholarship rests on an all too familiar conversation about journalism involvement, which repeatedly makes the call that journalists are either too involved or not involved enough.

Dziennikarz Niezależny? Etyka dziennikarska w praktyce

I want to begin with a statement made not long ago by online journalism maven Jeff Jarvis, who proclaimed that given the transformative state of journalism today, the most useful note we can offer budding journalists is the need for adaptability and willingness to embrace change.

Why have we not been able to do more in facilitating more continuous regard for it?

We instead insist on demarcations as if they have some real status recognizable in the world. And thirdly, the gaps and misnomers in our scholarship still bewilder.

Why have we not yet put that notion to bed? Not as a responsive reactive mode but as a proactive and anticipatory understanding of the multiple spatial and temporal forces that exist in various symbiotic relationships with the news.

History relentlessly repeats itself: Rather, I suggest we need to tweak journalismchanging it from a community that struggles to sidestep blows as they are launched into one that anticipates as much as it responds.

This suggests that journalism scholarship constitutes a valuable linch-pin between journalism and its aspirations to service the public sphere. This not only includes understanding why we harken back to the dziiennikarska in describing the new — as in the repetitive invocations of new journalism, for instance — but offers a persistent reminder that all environments have had multiple repetitive experiences over time. Are mobile phones and cameras bona fide instruments of newsmaking?


Not only does this reference comparative journalism in its many permutations, but it orients us to the tensions linking journalism in each location to what goes on at its boundaries.

ETYKA DZIENNIKARSKA by Sofiya Marchuk on Prezi

Journalism scholarship can teach journalists not to overgeneralize from a small number of cases, to consider events and issues incrementally, and to read.

How could we understand the workings of the polity? What this means is that because journalists, journalism educators and journalism scholars function within the boundaries and confines of their own multiple interpretive communities, journalism never finds its own voice in serving the public interest. But it started long before that. Making such assumptions diverts our attention from the necessary patterning in evolutionary models of journalistic practice, which are nearly always framed in conjunction with that which came before and often in not very novel ways.

Each of these three points orient backward rather than forward, paralleling in scholarship the reactivity we see emerging so acutely in journalists themselves. And for whose aims? Technically, journalists face new challenges from the blogosphere and other venues, which make the accomplishment of newswork tenuous.

What is it about journalism that sets such divergent reactions in motion?

How much does the world of journalism education reflect that of journalism? The idea of interpretive communities, originally suggested by Stanley Fish and developed in my own work and that of others, helps us situate groups as collectives using shared interpretative strategies that are integral to the knowledge that results.

In assuming that journalism is dynamic and constantly evolving? In the United States, much talk has recently targeted the idea that the academy can pick up and correct the ills wrought by corporate ownership of newspapers. My message should by now be clear: Journalists are not responsible for the world, but journalism scholars are instrumental to enabling a better connection between journalists and their world. These periods of temporal pregnancy echo elsewhere in the world etka — we can dziennikardka of the near simultaneous emergence of development journalism and asian values journalism in the s as answers to the deficiencies of models suggested by the global north.

This means pulling in a whole host of contextual variables that complicate the space of news, not only by compressing it into reactivity: How can they accommodate change? This means we engage with what is up close without taking account of variance introduced at the margins of our inquiry.

Does journalism not lie somewhere in between? And yet we do not study and teach journalism in a way that reflects this variegated and simultaneous engagement. I note here the now defunct Freedom Forum Center for Media Studies at Columbia University, which provided just such an opportunity to better understand the other side. Journalism is too important to be reactive.


Is the narrative journalism of today so very different from the literary experiments of Mark Twain? Although journalism has been around for as long as publics have needed mediated information about the larger world, journalism itself experiences a schizophrenic existence with the world. It reflects an engagement with the world — like ours — shaped not by discipline or medium but as a blended dziennikareka and take of all of the stimuli that feed into it.

A second overused interpretive strategy relates to how much our understanding of news dziennikarska been influenced by organizational logic, where work becomes routinized and controllable, not only for journalists but for academics too.

Etyka dziennikarska – Jan Pleszczyński – Google Books

Thomas Kuhn was most directly associated with the now somewhat fundamental notion that knowledge depends on consensus building, on developing shared paradigms that name and characterize problems and procedures in ways that are recognized by the group. Many of the starting points, end points and arguments connecting them feel familiar even when they are first broached.

But we can only do so if we reinvigorate our scholarly lenses enough to offer journalists new ways of regarding their role in servicing the public interest. Too much of our public conversations ride on the latest media failing, deficiency or outrage. Regardless of whether that plays out, we need additional forums for bringing journalists dziennikarsks journalism scholars together — journals publishing them side by side, forums in which they interact on common issues, platforms in which they carry on investigative and scholarly work together.

In dzienhikarska terms this calls for an increased orientation on the part of journalists toward other forces in the public sphere, for dziennikzrska increased degree of transparency about how journalists etjka, and for an increased recognition that others may be able to critique journalism better than journalists for the very reason that they look at journalism from its margins.

Is the online explosion so very different from the expansion into radio in the s?