This manual, the infamous KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, dated July , is the source of much of the material in the second manual. KUBARK. Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources. This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining.
|Country:||Central African Republic|
|Published (Last):||3 December 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is plainly true that the interrogation source cannot be understood in a vacuum, isolated from social context. For this reason definitions have been omitted for such terms as burn notice, defector, escapee, and refugee.
It’s a little bit down on that page, and don’t be surprised that every footer and header has secret crossed out, and that page to page has words, paragraphs or entire sections that are still redacted. To attain rapport, the interrogator should be friendly. Government, tasked with gathering, processing and analyzing national security information from around the world, primarily through the use of human intelligence HUMINT.
The greedy, demanding character often suffered from very early deprivation of affection or security. If source resistance is encountered during screening or during the opening or reconnaissance phases of the interrogation, non-coercive methods of sapping opposition and strengthening the tendency to yield and to cooperate may be applied. Why a Draft Would Weaken the U. Every interrogator knows that a real understanding of the individual is worth far more than a thorough knowledge of this or that pigeon-hole to which he has been consigned.
He sometimes gratifies his feeling of secret superiority by provoking unjust treatment.
The subject is likeliest to talk freely if the screener’s manner is friendly and patient. He frequently projects his guilt feelings and feels that all of his failures were someone else’s fault. If he does not, the interrogator makes an effort to draw him out about a hostile agent recently convicted in court or otherwise known to the witness. While the excerpts released countefintelligence the Pentagon are a useful and not misleading selection of the most egregious passages, the ones most clearly advocating torture, execution and blackmail, they do not provide adequate insight into the manuals’ highly objectionable framework.
Edited tape recordings which sound as though A had denounced B may also be used for the purpose, separately or in conjunction with the written “confession. During this first phase his attitude should remain business-like but also quietly counterkntelligence ostentatiously friendly and welcoming.
A counterintelligence interrogation consists of four parts: Kimberly rated it liked it Mar 24, Pressure tactics or hostility will make them retreat inside themselves, whereas reassurance will bring them out. His resistance is sapped, his urge to yield is fortified, until in the end he defeats himself.
Another reason for avoiding note-taking is that it distracts and sometimes worries the interrogatee. Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another kubarkk. People who show these characteristics are actually intfrrogation fearful. The New Indigenous Struggles in Mexico.
Agents, for example, are accustomed to being questioned repeatedly and professionally. His facial expression should not reveal special interest in any one statement; he should just seem sympathetic and understanding. The effect of someone wandering in because he forgot his pen or wants to invite the interrogator to lunch can be devastating. Therefore the interrogator must countterintelligence become hostile if confronted with initial hostility, or in any other way confirm such negative attitudes as he may encounter at the outset.
KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation
Any anxious inquiries from either can be met by a knowing interrpgation and some such reply as, “We’ll counyerintelligence to you in due time. But a quick confrontation has two weaknesses: The suggested procedure for arriving at a preliminary assessment of walk-ins remains the same [approx.
Learn how your comment data is processed. When, in the judgment of the interrogator, B is fairly well convinced that A has broken down and told his story, the interrogator may elect to say to B, “Now that A has come clean with us, I’d like to let him go. I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on Jan.
I feel, personally, that he was exaggerating a great counteeintelligence. He can shift the environment abruptly.
Is there a torture manual?
This is the oldest manual, and describes the use of abusive techniques, as exemplified by two references to the use of electric shock, in addition to use of threats and fear, sensory deprivation, and isolation. Counterimtelligence this small world of two inhabitants a clash of personalities — as distinct from a conflict of purposes — assumes exaggerated force, like a tornado in a wind-tunnel.
If the specific goals cannot be discerned clearly, further investigation oubark needed before querying starts. Old dogs can learn new tricks but not new ways of learning them.
We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates. As detailed questioning proceeds, addition biographic data will be revealed. The interrogator should resist this tendency.
TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » CIA, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Another key to the successful interrogation of the resisting source is the provision of an acceptable rationalization for yielding. Chaz Kerr rated it liked it Dec 17, Want to Read saving…. The source has identified himself with a cause, a political movement or organization, or an opposition intelligence service. Accordingly, unless it is considered that the prospective interrogatee is cooperative and will remain so indefinitely, the first step in planning an interrogation is to determine how long the source can be held.